Sunday, March 23, 2014

Fox's "Cosmos" Show Uses Its Own "Jesus Magic" To Define The Origins Of Life

Bottom Line Challenge:


(ANSWER:  NO.   This is where so called "science" breaks down.  They benefit from the fact that "Creationists" do no know how to debate)

DO NOT Allow A "Scientist" Conflate His Knowledge About "Matter And Physics" Into A Discussion About LIFE And Its Origins.

DO NOT Be Pacified With The News About "Evolutionary Reactions" To Environmental Stimuli FORCE HIM To Explain How Chemicals And Elements Got "Intelligent"

Saturday, March 08, 2014

The Gap Between The Demand For Dental/Medical Care For Black People In Atlanta AND The Supply Of Dental/Medical Professionals Operating In Close Proximity Is Only Exceeded By The Size Of This Gap Within The Greater Black Diaspora

Atlanta News, Weather, Traffic, and Sports | FOX 5


My challenge is for those who really care about the community to look at the AGGREGATE NEED for such care and to align the EDUCATIONAL GUIDANCE that is implemented in their community with the need to have young people matriculate through to the process where they are made into Dentists, Physicians, Registered Nurses, etc and can serve as the DISRUPTIVE FORCE in the healthcare market place.

Sunday, February 23, 2014

Dear Abby: "I Enjoy Having Sexual Hookups With My Bisexual Boyfriend But When I See Him With His 'Baby Momma' And The Baby I Get Jealous" - Do I Have To Wait Till Society 'Progresses' And Removes The 'Hetero-Normative' Pressure ?

Dear Abby - Philadelphia Daily News - Feb 24, 2014

Q: I'M a gay man who recently met a guy on Jack'd (a gay social app). At first, it was nothing serious. It was just for sex. I'm a strict top. He's a bottom.
But last month, I saw him out with his daughter (he's bisexual), and I found myself looking at him in a different way. I think he did the same with me once he saw me all dressed up in business clothes.
What concerns me is that he says he still has urges for women. We've been seeing each other for the last couple of weeks, and I'm wondering if things could ever work out between us.

Mia: It's possible. But before you start worrying about tomorrow, why not slow your roll and concentrate on today? You two barely know each other. Take your time.
Peel the layers back on this guy's personality while he does the same with yours. Enjoy the process. Tomorrow will take care of itself.

Steve: Whether he's bi or gay won't determine his loyalty to you. The quality of your relationship will.

Q: My girlfriend and I practice safe sex, except for when it comes to oral sex. I don't even know where to find a dental dam. She never says anything when she does me, so I don't bring it up.
In the back of my mind, I wonder if we're being stupid? We broke up a while ago but got back together about a month ago.

Mia: Did you know you can make a dental dam? Just cut the tip off an unlubricated condom and cut down one side. You'll wind up with a flat piece of latex. The next time you have a date night, make a couple in advance.
To protect your girlfriend during oral sex, stock up on flavored condoms. Also, you really should get tested so that you both know your HIV status. Limiting the number of sex partners either of you has also reduces your risk.

Steve: Getting tested for HIV is step one. Kudos to you for being concerned about safe sex.


First off - the #1 most guilty body regarding the matter that I am about to speak of is the "Heterosexual Community" (a self-inclusive statement) and their choice to violate most of the key measures of "Institutional Integrity" that would allow the mantle of traditions and that which can be surmised by the intrinsic physiological differences and complimentary condition between man and woman.

Believe it or not - despite the seemingly frequent references to same sex relationships on this particular blog (the social/cultural strategy blog - diluted of politics as much as possible) I cannot bring myself to make use of GOVERNMENT FORCE to induce two or more consenting adults to do or not do what I believe is "right".

Instead this blog takes the position that such a society, in aggregate must accept that it alone has the RESPONSIBILITY to order and enforce the behaviors and norms of the people in line with the "directed outcomes" that it seeks as a society.

With this cry of "liberty" and "freedom" - such a society must prepare itself to accept the functional outcomes that are produced.

The choice to have more causal male/female - baby producing relationships is as damaging to the society than the notion of the culture that propagandizes the "normalization" of same sex relationships using the common progressive disarmament words of "equality", "rights" and "justice" and the correlated attacks upon those who stand for a more traditional read on both homosexual and heterosexual relationships.

The advice given to both sets of letters amount to "non-judgmental junk science".

The one "strictly dickly" male who feels a bit of jealousy upon seeing his "f#*k buddy" paired up with the female through which he bore a child is merely a permutation of the "serial baby daddy" figures inside of a close circle of a community by which the various females are likely to bump into each other and see the respective "half brothers and sisters" of their own children.

LESS than I care to focus upon the "homosexual relationship' is the attempt at WRECKING THE ORDER OF OUR SOCIETY AND CULTURE.

We are long past the debate on the content of the "Dear Abby" columns - where the circa 1965 edition would have been forced by the journalistic code book to use analogies (birds and the bees) rather than straight up language such as "oral sex" and "gay sex buddies".

My problem with this (supposedly) enlightened set of operatives is that they are actually cowards.  They have no plans what so ever to take ownership for the "baby that they are birthing".  There are still enough "right-wing oppressive cultural traditions" for them to fight against and take down before the dust settles and their disciples take a look at where they stand in relationship to the grand promise.

The columnist states that the "quality of the relationship" between the two gay males will define the bisexual man's propensity to remain gay and faithful with him.

Logically - from this "problem" we will see claims that it is the fault of the "Hetero-Normative" society that is putting pressure on this chap to "be a family man" rather than remain as the "Bottom Boy" in the sexual relationship.

In "peeling back" the onion on each of their personalities - "Dear Mia and Steve" never addressed the TRUTH about the one man's totality as a man.

Maybe his desire to produce a child and be a father extends beyond his SEXUAL APPETITE and that IT IS THEY (Mia and Steve) who are seeking to reduce his complexity for the advancement of their own agenda.

If I as a heterosexual male - who is sitting at his computer on a weekend evening COULD express my own sexual appetite by heading up to some gentleman's club and putting out enough money to become "a trusted friend" with a dancer who then gives me her number - is this draw away from my family a "discovery of myself" OR should I consider the consequences to my long term married relationship and my children and household that I have built up?

Ultimate "Mia and Steve" and others have a world view that will never comport with so many the order of relationships that are PROVEN to have a greater chance of producing the "well balanced and free" American citizens that we all claim to favor.

Saturday, February 15, 2014

The "Homosexual Media Lobby" And The Propagandizing Of "The New Normal"

MTv - True Life - "My Boyfriend Embarrasses Me - When He Becomes A Drag Queen Diva"

I am dating a bisexual man who is also a drag queen.
The PROBLEM IS NOT with this intrinsically problematic situation as he claims that he is monogamous with whomever he is in a relationship with.

I just can't stand when he becomes an INTOLERABLE DIVA and then I HAVE TO WEAR THE PANTS in the relationship in order to MAINTAIN ORDER.  

I am not sure how long I can take this.

AGAIN - We are asked to believe that this is just a NORMAL DAY IN THE LIFE IN AMERICA.

We are being propagandized with he notion that GENDER ROLES are just happenstance.  
Our open minded media is merely today just opening a WIDER LENS upon America and that WE as consumers need to be more tolerant. 

Russia's Gay Night Club - A Refuge In A Sea Of Violence
The trajectory of the debate is predictable:

"How Can You CLAIM To Repudiate The Violence Against Homosexuals In Russia And Uganda Yet You Support The 'Anti-Sodomy Laws' Which Lead To Jail Time For Those Who Seek To Freely Express Who They Are?"

The goal is to generate pro-Gay activism but mostly to silence in the face of the clear media propagandism in support of the current run up of "Gay Rights" by those who are seeking to define "The NEW NORMAL" and who feign outrage that EVERYONE has not yet gotten the memo.

Try and focus on the issue of A FRAMEWORK OF SOCIETAL STABILITY where, like it or not THERE ARE STRONG GENDER ROLES that are both enforced by society and UNDERSTOOD based upon the messaging that is carried out throughout society.

What type of stability can be had from these two scenes where GAY MALES IN DRAG are considered "NORMAL AND FREE" - as ABC News called it during their advocacy?

If there is such a thing as "Establishment Power Repudiation" in which those who have given birth to such a society per their activism against "The Machine", yet when they get into power and are now in control over the "Commanding Heights" and are forced to produce the society benefits that they attacked the previous establishment for failing to do so because of BIGOTRY - this new school promises to fail to develop even more people yet deny their hand in the matter.

The common talking points of "Freedom", "Equality" and "Discrimination-Free Society" are the key DISARMING WORDS by which we all are asked to "LIVE UP TO".   Yet this equation fails to include the DAMAGE that is suffered by individuals who live in a society that ultimately fails to provide a sufficient infrastructure upon which people are developed within the ecosystem which has certain issues that have plagued man throughout the millennium settled into a stable operating base.


The woman in the first frame should not be surprised to see that there is no future in her relationship with an off the wall "diva".   And, heaven forbid, if she is exposed to the HIV virus as "her man" chooses to engage in "The Life" - add this as yet another set of risks that she chose to look past.

The Russian situation is more complex.  ME PERSONALLY chooses to look at the chaotic condition in Central Africa in which there is societal breakdown in violence and terrorism - concluding that while the gay minority has it bad in the face of violent thugs seeking to enforce anti-Sodomy - the larger population of Africans in the center of the continent suffer from a far more indiscriminate amount of terror.

YOU HELP ME FIX CENTRAL AFRICA FIRST and then I'll help you fight Homophobia in Russia.

We tried that one before.

Monday, January 13, 2014

There Is No Such Thing As "Non-Judgemental". There Is Only A New List Of Discriminators

Chicago Black Youth Trapped In Violence: "Violence Won't End Until We Can Make Money Off Of Peace"

MSNBC - Melissa Harris-Perry Anti-Gun Violence Series

Most people, upon viewing these remarks will consider this young male as being unrealistic.

His view is correct.  His construct is wrong.

The ECOSYSTEM of Chicago has failed to produce the conditions through which young Black people like him can be more fully engaged in the productive operations of the community - in their pursuit to retain a desired STANDARD OF LIVING.

We hear positive reactions to "The Pope" as he notes the damage of capitalistic lust.   This notion is applied to wealth people.

Yet if we consider how the Catholic church has a legacy of compelling believers to submit themselves to "God" through the church, becoming nuns, priests and fathers - that ran the church institution and associated Catholic school - the proper answer to this young man's perspective is to ask the ADULTS in the community:  "What would you have the young people in your community to submit to, adopting a disposition of 'Denial of Self' so that more of the 'Social Justice Rights' that you ascribe to the larger community are now delivered as a more local dispensation?"

Tuesday, January 07, 2014

I Disagree With Evander Holyfield's Line Of Argument That Says "Homosexuality Is Not 'Normal' "

In my assessment - Former boxing Heavyweight champ - Evander Holyfield has just "Stepped In It" with his statements that "Homosexuality is not 'Normal' ".

Just as "they" (ubiquitous "they") can BRING THEIR OWN BIBLE VERSE to argue against many of the things that Holyfield believes in as "normal" - so is the case with his inspection of the "normality" of homosexuality.

In the next few weeks we will likely hear sundry details of Mr Holyfield's:
  • Serial Marriages
  • Adultry
  • Fornication
 He set up this attack on his person  because of the paucity of his argument.


I am against a government attempting to regulate the personal and social behavior of free individuals - as long as they don't harm anyone else in their course of living.

HOWEVER - as a SOCIETY (and for those of us 'People Of Faith') we are asked to "Help Our Fellow Man".

Those (who I believe) are seeking to USE this mandate to make POLITICAL gains, by shifting this which is an INDIVIDUAL calling from our spiritual, religious and "character" composition to "Help Our Fellow Man' - seek to stand at the "ribbon cutting" ritual - thanks to the use of other people's money - to claim that THEY have a special closeness with "God" as evidenced by their public policy.

When we inspect a bit further - the misalignment is exposed.
We can all agree that "broken familial relationships" are a key source of much of the dysfunction that we see in our society as children are imprinted with messages that run awry of what is statistically proven to be the key construct for success at allowing them to reach closer to their full potential.

I DO NOT get caught up into the trap that "Marriage is for 'baby making", only to suffer the "Well Why Do You Allow Elderly Straight Couples Who Won't Have Children To Marry Then?"

The bottom line is that we are talking about THEORIES OF SOCIETAL GOVERNANCE.

I REFUSE to allow a radical upstart set of theories to use their TRANSACTIONAL, Ideological Imperialism - to create a "New Societal Normal" - only to follow through with the "Establishment Power Repudiation" scheme - in which the resulting problems that REMAIN offer them yet another round of a "Struggle Motion" that will promise "a fix" - if they are giving more power and time to "correct them".

Ironically - those who argue most vociferously against the "exclusivity" that elite ranks of the society enjoy ( a special interest with power) are themselves guilty of trying to arrange POWER for their own bit of cultural imperialism as they operate like a 'distributor cap', seeking to cut a deal with a serial collection of special interest groups (transactional advocacy) - without assuming the responsibility of the establishment - WHO MUST STAND ACCOUNTABLE FOR "THE WHOLE".

In the pile of "unfinished business" - as the rotor on the 'distributor cap' rotates to the next special interest - the same vulnerable people whose COMMUNITY INSTITUTIONS have been taken over yet destroyed in their capability to develop the people who are most in need of order and the synergy of two adults, coupled together to support the effort of maintaining a house and a family - as THIS is "The Norm".  The "normality" of homosexuality is an IRRELEVANT discussion.

What we have is a SOCIETAL CHOICE at hand.

NO the world is not going to blow up with "hellfire" if "Same Sex Marriage" is made legal.  At the same time you will NOT have the balance of 6 year old children observe "same sex behavior" among adults and believe this to be anything but an exception.

Societal tolerance - yes.

The PRIORITIZATION OF THE NEED for STRONG FAMILIES, headed by one man and one woman, as a STRATEGIC foundation for a strong future - anything else IS ABNORMAL.

I will support YOUR STRUGGLE - when YOU finish BUILDING UP MY PEOPLE - as you had promised when you collected their valuables.

Friday, January 03, 2014

I Have No Confidence That The "Christian Biblical Creation Museum" Representative Can Properly Expose The Flaws In Bill Nye's Arguments For Evolution

AJC: Bill Nye to visit Creation Museum for debate

I have listened to atheist scientist Bill Nye argue for the theory of evolution several times.
I can imagine that the right-wing "Biblical Creationists" will go head-first, attempting to prove that the Earth was created in the 7 day interval that one receives with a literal read of the bible.  

Bill Nye will the lock them into the "Earth Is 6,000 Years Old" argument and them pick them apart from there.

The problem is that those who take Bill Nye's position "Anti-Creationism", "Pro-Evolution" mostly get to "KEEP THEIR DEBATE OPPONENT ON TRIAL", using science to refute their faith-based claim BUT never having to defend their position on evolution, at the hands of a person who is equally committed to science and logic.

The key flaws in Nye's argument will likely not be captured by the biblical creationist:

  1. Nye argues that life formed from basic components (amino acids) that made more complex organisms over time
  2. He then notes the concept of "half-life", as fissile materials decay, losing electrons and changing from one element to another

  • Most people don't note the slight of hand of accepting scientific fact of decay of uranium, for example, but then conflating that into change in LIVING ORGANISMS.  
  • If a pile of chemicals were left alone for billions of years - Bill Nye CAN PRODUCE NO EVIDENCE that LIFE could ever be produced from such inert materials, REGARDLESS of the addition of heat, pressure or light
It would be a better argument for Bill Nye to be made to defend his theories.

Sunday, December 22, 2013

The Theft Of The "Black Community Governance Culture" Using "WE" And "Using WHITE FOLKS As The Input Variable To Solve For The 'Black Community's Equation' - A Mis-Analysis Of Sharkeisha

I heard this song from Quadir Lateef while driving and listening to the radio.

Quadir Lateef made a rap-commentary about the viral Internet video showing the attack by "Sharkeisha" against her unsuspecting friend who took a suckerpunch to the face over some beef regarding Sharkeisha's boyfriend.

In my first past through the song I agreed with Quadir Lateef as it sounded like he was calling for greater dignity and consciousness in the behavior in our community.

The "ghetto name" of "Sharkeisha" is cool.
Two Black girls fighting on camera - not cool.

After I found the song on "YouTube" and listened carefully to the words - I was forced to reject Quadir Lateef's arguments.

I notice that Quadir Lateef is the "conscious rapper" from the documentary on "Flint Michigan" called "The Flint Town Kids"

Quadir Lateef's Argument For More Conscious Public Behavior" For Black People Is Centered Upon What WHITE FOLKS Think About Black People Rather Than What BLACK PEOPLE NEED TO DO TO ENGINEER DESIRED OUTCOMES - And Thus The Argument Must Be Rejected

  • QL points to how "White people" like to promote Black people fighting - Sharkeisha was not thinking about WHITE FOLKS when she socked her friend int the face.
    • We must look at the CULTURAL ASSOCIATIONS that were injected into Sharkeisha's mind - in which her "conflict resolution" skills fell far short
  • QL points to how "White people" like to mock "Ghetto Names" - knowing that no White girl would ever be named "Sharkeisha"
    • This is an IRRELEVANT POINT.   When naming your child EITHER to choose the name you want - the response made by various forces in society 'Be Damned' OR you THINK FORWARD about how this permanent label worn by your child - who will one day be an adult and a parent will impact her.   
    • FAR FROM demanding that all Black people name their children nondescript names like  "Megan", "Brad", "Madison" or "Jason" - it IS important to think of a name as a permanent fixture - just like a tattoo on your face that the "wearer" might one day reget

The real problem is that - in the battle between the LARGER SOCIETAL CULTURE that is falling further "off of the rails" and the BLACK COMMUNITY'S need to foment and field a "Black Community Governance Culture" that protects people who have "limited options" - like Sharkeisha" from acting out, thinking, saying or committing actions which require a "punitive response" - thus taking away even more of their flexibility in reversing course without their past mistakes serving as a tether.

Saturday, November 30, 2013

The Church - Using Popularist Messages On "The Civil Rights March On Washington" And "Gay Marriage" To Shift People's Focus Toward "The Will Of Man"

This post is not to debate the point of "Gay Marriage in the Methodist church".

I want to note several patterns that you see in "Christians" who ultimately seek to adopt a "Don't Hate On My Thing And I Won't Hate On Yours" - as they attempt to ultimately compromise the integrity of the church.

Notice the Pro-Gay Marriage Methodist priest.  First he says "There is no references to homosexuality in the bible".   This is a flat out lie.  I have heard this talking point used among some clergy in which they stretch logic beyond all reasonable proportions, using verbal gymnastics to appease those who they understand want to be appeased.

The most tell-tail sign of an individual who is pushing "man's will", however, is when they work to discredit the bible, pointing out how many things that Christians today have retired from strict adherence as a means of getting another retired.

Then ask for his support in a REFORMATION - by which ALL POSSIBLE MANDATES IN THE BIBLE are now enforced.  

Only then - watch him call YOU an extremist or a zealot.  His goal WAS NOT to expunge the double-standards that are practiced today.  His agenda was to get you to "Stop Hating".

They want to focus the conversation on DISCRIMINATION.  Yet JESUS came to

  • Turn father against son
  • Turn mother against daughter 
  • Turn daughter-in-law against mother-in-law
The context of this pronouncement is that those who are disciples might have to endure conflict with their cherished loved ones who try to get them to yield from their new-found Christian faith, as they prefer the old form.



I can't say that I blame the "gay rights" advocates for pushing their agenda.  They see that the society has largely abandoned the notion of marriage as the pretext for

  • Men and women living together
  • Child birth
  • The foundational unit of a sound community

The celebration of the 50th anniversary of "The March On Washington" - in which the Civil Rights Pharisees, who leverage their "moral authority" were allowed to get on stage and self-celebrate their grandeur while they told their congregation "We Have Work Yet To Be Done" (focusing upon their right wing enemies, rather than INTERNAL regulation) is a ritualistic scheme that is worthy of more scrutiny.

Unfortunately - "Religious And Ethics Newsweekly" is not the forum that is going to do this.

As it is true that PRINCIPALITIES and CORRUPT INSTITUTIONS had systematically oppressed and assaulted Black people, requiring a full frontal assault, lead by the church before CHANGE was acquired - today's problems within the Black community and the greater society require no less consideration.

No one at "R.&E.N." will bother to note that the establishment power, most especially within the Black community have the favor of the Civil Rights Pharisees who were upon the stage.

Yet as we consider:

  • The spirit of violence and murder
  • The dysfunction that is in the mind of our young people that serves as a barrier to their acquisition of education
  • The continued lack of economic uplift as God-given skills are misaligned from God-ordained potential
No public media forum like 'R&E.N." is going to enumerate these painful truths and ask this establishment that was assembled on stage:  'WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH THE PIECES OF SILVER THAT WAS ALLOTTED TO YOU?"

Instead they are more likely to echo the refrain of their heroes:  "There is more work yet to be done"