Saturday, July 12, 2014

My Debate With A Great Deceiver Who Has Had "Army Psych Ops" Training: "What Is YOUR Agenda With The Black Community

This is an actual debate that I am having with a BLACK MAN who says that his goal is EQUALITY.

Names Removed

THIS POST IS ABOUT THE "THEFT THAT POLITICAL OPPORTUNISM" Represents To The Institutions Of The Americanized Negro
My Friend The Former Army Psych Ops Operative posted the following

My First Response:

Can you detail a single "Presidential Power" that has been stripped from President Obama because he is Black, that the 43 White men before him had

While you would be hard pressed to detail how "Obama's Presidential Powers" have been violated - I have a boatload of American Government Policies to provide you that - the people who are now claiming that "President Obama is a victim of racism" used to call out as RACIST.

The brilliance of getting Black people and progressives to focus on "White Right Wing Racism Against Obama" - is that it stifles the Left's typical role of working as a watchdog against the US government's excesses and Constitutional/ Human Rights violations around the world.

What you won't likely accept, *********- is that with President Obama in power as a "Progressive Vessel" to fight against your Right-Wing enemy truth you are merely admitting what you VALUE more (ie: the fight against the right wing) than your claimed stance for Equality, Justice, Rights.

The worst place to find evidence of these attributes that you claim to be striving for is in the areas where the "Right-Wing Enemy" has been pushed out of power and your ideological soul mates are challenged with managing and producing rather than just advocating and propagandizing.

Are the lives of the people in West Philly, South side Chicago or Detroit who are "Fighting Vicariously Through Obama" "BETTER" - 50 years after fighting, voting and putting favorable people into power?

It seems to me that your "Psych Ops" training s

My Friend Responded With The Standard "Jedi Mind Trick"

(Note he deleted these responses as well as my initial response because I told him that I would rephase them from Indictments of him to Questions of him)

  • I am going to stop you from posting on my page
  • Why are you Anti-Obama?
  • Why do you sound like the Tea Party Racists?
  • I post on my page to promote the positive and you are negative

THIS IS PSYCH OPS 101 -  Make me feel threatened that if I continue my course I will be blocked from doing what I want to do - DEBATE WITH HIM.

I am going to give you my analysis of the situation without making an indictment of you or anyone else

1) After watching "Al Jezeera America" "Borderland" in which (about) 8 Americans traveled to Central America to retrace the route that "illegal immigrants" take into America - ANYONE WHO ATTEMPTS TO MAKE THIS MATTER AN ISSUE OF "THE US GOVERNMENT" is a fraud.

There is NO LEGISLATION that can be crafted in the United States that is going to prevent the train load of people, riding atop of a cargo train from moving closer to the US border in order to live out their dream.

The woman with a 9 year old daughter who was warned about the perils that she faced (rape, robbery and, worst of all - DEATH per the 4 to 5 day walk through the Arizona desert) had a "God/Heaven-like view of America" - this in the context of the "Hell" that she experienced in El Salvador.

During the Civil Rights Era the "Racist South" suffered from terrorism and official corruption that gave hell to the Black people who lived there.

Today in Central America the very same terror, gang terrorism (KKK), official corruption and chaos is in place in this area.

The TWO CORRUPT PARTIES IN AMERICA DON'T GIVE A DAMN about the PEOPLE and what they are suffering through in Central America and Mexico. 
They care more about firing shots against their political/ideological enemies in America - but most assuredly NEITHER of them are going to cross the border en masse - as part of their "Social Justice Outreach" to provide any measure of relief to "The least of these" from the SYSTEMATIC forces of corruption and violence that are exposing these people to terrorism, their children becoming wasted resources whose potential is stolen.

$3.7 billion spent to house the small portion of them that came to America and or to hire more judges to send them back - is not going to solve the problem.

If there was one situation in which the American Right and Left can prove that they are something more than political opportunist hacks inside of America - it would be for them to do something for direct engagement where these people live - outside of the US Government.

My Friend's Responses

I am curious what is your end game with your questions, are you trying to convert me to your way of thinking, are you trying to open my eyes to "how bad President Obama is", what are you trying to convince me of because you are putting way too much effort into it.

I love the last part of this statement"let's help America together ". I learned from experience that divided we fall united we stand, instead of always trying to find fault, why not put the same energy into finding a solution or a compromise?

We will never completely agree but working together to find a common ground to Americans should be the goal. If people could put their political agenda aside and be concern about the average American without pointing fingers, then we can start fixing things and workout our differences.

My Final Response

So you are not going to answer the questions.  I have nothing to hide so I will answer the new question that you asked of me.


1) When Black people - in West Philly, Chicago, Camden, Detroit or anywhere else BUY INTO a message that always has them reaching, reaching, reaching out for something - in which after they invest their valuables on the promise of SALVATION - that THEY (the Black Community) are left with the character and integrity - to begin to pause from looking at the force that is OFFENDING THEM and begin to also look at the force that promises them COMFORT - as they put their foot down and ask these friends:  WHERE IS MY DEVELOPMENT THAT YOU PROMISED ME as I walked along with you.  MY AGENDA is to compel the Black Community to look at their investments into these "friends"  and ask them - to produce their promise rather than lead them

2) MY End Game is to get those who claim that their agenda is "EQUALITY" - to look outside of the American Political Realm and PROVE that they are competent at producing 'Equality" - by applying these principals to the people in Haiti, El Salvador, Guatemala, Chad, The Congo - because IF their agenda is really "Equality" to HELP common man - their actions would not be so focused upon America, Political Boundaries, Elections in America and 'The Enemy' in the confines of American Political &  Race Relations - because then they will see that the enemy to the EQUALITY for "The Least Of These People" all over the world is the lack of STRONG INSTITUTIONS that protect them and allow them to use their God given talents, applying them toward the development of their community and the uplift of their people and nation

3) MY End Game is to ask the people to TELL ME - to DEFINE this notion of "EQUALITY" that they would have "Their People" buy into:
*** What Land has this "Equality" that they seek ever been produced upon?

*** What People in history has achieved this level of EQUALITY?

*** What form of Government has enforced this EQUALITY?

*** What ultimately lead to the destruction of this land of EQUALITY?

You see********** - I am wise to the scheme of Daily KOS and "The Koch Brothers".    "Fox News" and "The Center For American Progress".

While Malcolm X spoke of the "Snarling Fox" and "The Wolf" (Liberals and Conservatives) and how they both work to make "Black People" Political Footballs - it seems that today the Popular Black Political Theology only wants to talk about the 'Conservative Wolf" because so many of them are now allowed to play on the "Starting Team Of The Snarling Fox".

I have learned that as I am presented various "Disarmament Words" (Equality, Diversity, Social Justice, 'War On Women") that it is my responsibility to affirm the veracity of the people who come my way, attempting to draw upon any "Black Grievances" and "Political Opportunism" that they perceive in me.     The antidote that will free anyone who is interested in viewing these people with a clear mind is what I call the "Intellectual Space/Time Distortion".

Since their main prize is the "American National Political" space you must:

***  (Inward Space) Go INTO The Black Community and show them INEQUALITY and make them PRODUCE EQUALITY among Black people - particularly in the places where their ideology is the 'Last Man Standing" Among the people.

**** (Outward Space) Go OUTWARD into the "Black Diaspora" or "Nations Of Color" - and force them to tell you WHY do they focus upon "America is the only developed nation that does not offer women paid leave for pregnancy" - force them to tell you why they never mention what African Women, Asian Women, South American women do for maternity leave and why do they skip over 5.5/ 7ths of the worlds Population in order to focus upon what European nations do?  This as they advocate for "America's Poor"

****(Time Past) Inspect how the Black Community's "Struggle Motion" has been fused into their case for more than 50 years - and force them to explain why the institutions that they themselves are to produce EQUALITY AMONG ALL (The Educational System) is in the condition as it is today while on their watch.  And why do they protest for EQUAL educational funding - when EDUCATION, when reduced to its basic components is a LEARNED ADULT seeing the children in front of them as a GREAT ENOUGH PRIORITY by which they, in sufficient numbers, impart their knowledge upon the people - because sitting before them is their FUTURE and this is a mission that can't be outsourced

**** (Time Future) Force them to MAKE YOU TO TELL YOU THE SPECIFIC TIME FRAME- that their present movement for "Equality" as it is presently cast is going to produce these results and pull  out a time line in which you document specific "WAYPOINTS" by which they are made to achieve certain agreed upon goals - OR ELSE you reserve the right to abandon them- as you now see that they are merely stringing you along for THEIR AGENDA.


Now tell me - What is Your Agenda.
Table Cell
Table Cell

Friday, June 06, 2014

Having Tossed Out The Cultural/Moral Basis For Regulating Sex Between Heterosexual College Students - The California System May Mandate Written Consent Between Partners Before Sex To Avoid Legal Liability

Let's review the key moment in "College Sexual Relationships"

  • What initially started out as "Single Gender Schools" - with males going toward professional and trade schools while women going to "finishing schools" and education ............
  • Transformed into co-ed schools that closely regulated the interactions between the sexes
  • The 1960s/70s gave way to more liberalized dormitory settings where gender segregated buildings gave way to gender segregated floors.  (Hey I'm not hating.  I used to hop on the elevator to go see my girlfriend on the 6th floor, no inter-building security to deal with)
  • In the 1980's "Bob Jones University" was the sore thumb, sticking out with its policy that required Inter-Racial Dating on campus to be accompanied by notice to one's parents back at home
  • And finally today - With the drive against "Campus Rape" - in which SOME (I said "some" not all) drunken co-ed party situations turn into sex with a female who was too inebriated to give consent - the University Of California system plans to require consent in writing prior to sex.

Now of course they are only talking about "Heterosexual Sex" but - they are likely to include "Homosexual Sex" because of diversity and inclusivity mandates.

The Limits Of "Do It If It Feels Good"

After tearing down all of the other "cultural/ religious" based prohibitions that attempted to stop or at least slow down the rate of casual sexual relationships between men and women - it turns out that LEGAL LIABILITY - notably coming from the "Stop Campus Rape Campaign" driven today by feminists who believe that colleges are sweeping a serious problem under the rug - we are seeing a slight reversal of terms, but not due to any "conservative" backlash.

It is my opinion that "women" (and children) are made most vulnerable in a society whose rules are "made up as they go along" (popularism over traditional values as a basis for governance).

While the tear down of societal strictures by standing up "right-wing ogors" who wish to drag society back into the cultural stone age has been successful - we now see there is indeed a need for "rules" that define heterosexual relationships - especially between young people full of hormones and alcohol. 

Don't be fooled however.   The U of C system has merely continued to place the ultimate decisions of "societal norms" between these two individuals.  They only are only now distributing a "condom pack" with a "Yes I Consent / No I Do Not" check box upon it.  (this is merely an analogy).   

It is not being done because the secular university "saw the light".

They are being pressured via the force of law and large punitive awards - to 'Do Something' to contractualize heterosexual sex on campus.

This without drawing from any moral or religious codes of conduct. 

Sunday, March 23, 2014

Fox's "Cosmos" Show Uses Its Own "Jesus Magic" To Define The Origins Of Life

Bottom Line Challenge:


(ANSWER:  NO.   This is where so called "science" breaks down.  They benefit from the fact that "Creationists" do no know how to debate)

DO NOT Allow A "Scientist" Conflate His Knowledge About "Matter And Physics" Into A Discussion About LIFE And Its Origins.

DO NOT Be Pacified With The News About "Evolutionary Reactions" To Environmental Stimuli FORCE HIM To Explain How Chemicals And Elements Got "Intelligent"

Saturday, March 08, 2014

The Gap Between The Demand For Dental/Medical Care For Black People In Atlanta AND The Supply Of Dental/Medical Professionals Operating In Close Proximity Is Only Exceeded By The Size Of This Gap Within The Greater Black Diaspora

Atlanta News, Weather, Traffic, and Sports | FOX 5


My challenge is for those who really care about the community to look at the AGGREGATE NEED for such care and to align the EDUCATIONAL GUIDANCE that is implemented in their community with the need to have young people matriculate through to the process where they are made into Dentists, Physicians, Registered Nurses, etc and can serve as the DISRUPTIVE FORCE in the healthcare market place.

Sunday, February 23, 2014

Dear Abby: "I Enjoy Having Sexual Hookups With My Bisexual Boyfriend But When I See Him With His 'Baby Momma' And The Baby I Get Jealous" - Do I Have To Wait Till Society 'Progresses' And Removes The 'Hetero-Normative' Pressure ?

Dear Abby - Philadelphia Daily News - Feb 24, 2014

Q: I'M a gay man who recently met a guy on Jack'd (a gay social app). At first, it was nothing serious. It was just for sex. I'm a strict top. He's a bottom.
But last month, I saw him out with his daughter (he's bisexual), and I found myself looking at him in a different way. I think he did the same with me once he saw me all dressed up in business clothes.
What concerns me is that he says he still has urges for women. We've been seeing each other for the last couple of weeks, and I'm wondering if things could ever work out between us.

Mia: It's possible. But before you start worrying about tomorrow, why not slow your roll and concentrate on today? You two barely know each other. Take your time.
Peel the layers back on this guy's personality while he does the same with yours. Enjoy the process. Tomorrow will take care of itself.

Steve: Whether he's bi or gay won't determine his loyalty to you. The quality of your relationship will.

Q: My girlfriend and I practice safe sex, except for when it comes to oral sex. I don't even know where to find a dental dam. She never says anything when she does me, so I don't bring it up.
In the back of my mind, I wonder if we're being stupid? We broke up a while ago but got back together about a month ago.

Mia: Did you know you can make a dental dam? Just cut the tip off an unlubricated condom and cut down one side. You'll wind up with a flat piece of latex. The next time you have a date night, make a couple in advance.
To protect your girlfriend during oral sex, stock up on flavored condoms. Also, you really should get tested so that you both know your HIV status. Limiting the number of sex partners either of you has also reduces your risk.

Steve: Getting tested for HIV is step one. Kudos to you for being concerned about safe sex.


First off - the #1 most guilty body regarding the matter that I am about to speak of is the "Heterosexual Community" (a self-inclusive statement) and their choice to violate most of the key measures of "Institutional Integrity" that would allow the mantle of traditions and that which can be surmised by the intrinsic physiological differences and complimentary condition between man and woman.

Believe it or not - despite the seemingly frequent references to same sex relationships on this particular blog (the social/cultural strategy blog - diluted of politics as much as possible) I cannot bring myself to make use of GOVERNMENT FORCE to induce two or more consenting adults to do or not do what I believe is "right".

Instead this blog takes the position that such a society, in aggregate must accept that it alone has the RESPONSIBILITY to order and enforce the behaviors and norms of the people in line with the "directed outcomes" that it seeks as a society.

With this cry of "liberty" and "freedom" - such a society must prepare itself to accept the functional outcomes that are produced.

The choice to have more causal male/female - baby producing relationships is as damaging to the society than the notion of the culture that propagandizes the "normalization" of same sex relationships using the common progressive disarmament words of "equality", "rights" and "justice" and the correlated attacks upon those who stand for a more traditional read on both homosexual and heterosexual relationships.

The advice given to both sets of letters amount to "non-judgmental junk science".

The one "strictly dickly" male who feels a bit of jealousy upon seeing his "f#*k buddy" paired up with the female through which he bore a child is merely a permutation of the "serial baby daddy" figures inside of a close circle of a community by which the various females are likely to bump into each other and see the respective "half brothers and sisters" of their own children.

LESS than I care to focus upon the "homosexual relationship' is the attempt at WRECKING THE ORDER OF OUR SOCIETY AND CULTURE.

We are long past the debate on the content of the "Dear Abby" columns - where the circa 1965 edition would have been forced by the journalistic code book to use analogies (birds and the bees) rather than straight up language such as "oral sex" and "gay sex buddies".

My problem with this (supposedly) enlightened set of operatives is that they are actually cowards.  They have no plans what so ever to take ownership for the "baby that they are birthing".  There are still enough "right-wing oppressive cultural traditions" for them to fight against and take down before the dust settles and their disciples take a look at where they stand in relationship to the grand promise.

The columnist states that the "quality of the relationship" between the two gay males will define the bisexual man's propensity to remain gay and faithful with him.

Logically - from this "problem" we will see claims that it is the fault of the "Hetero-Normative" society that is putting pressure on this chap to "be a family man" rather than remain as the "Bottom Boy" in the sexual relationship.

In "peeling back" the onion on each of their personalities - "Dear Mia and Steve" never addressed the TRUTH about the one man's totality as a man.

Maybe his desire to produce a child and be a father extends beyond his SEXUAL APPETITE and that IT IS THEY (Mia and Steve) who are seeking to reduce his complexity for the advancement of their own agenda.

If I as a heterosexual male - who is sitting at his computer on a weekend evening COULD express my own sexual appetite by heading up to some gentleman's club and putting out enough money to become "a trusted friend" with a dancer who then gives me her number - is this draw away from my family a "discovery of myself" OR should I consider the consequences to my long term married relationship and my children and household that I have built up?

Ultimate "Mia and Steve" and others have a world view that will never comport with so many the order of relationships that are PROVEN to have a greater chance of producing the "well balanced and free" American citizens that we all claim to favor.

Saturday, February 15, 2014

The "Homosexual Media Lobby" And The Propagandizing Of "The New Normal"

MTv - True Life - "My Boyfriend Embarrasses Me - When He Becomes A Drag Queen Diva"

I am dating a bisexual man who is also a drag queen.
The PROBLEM IS NOT with this intrinsically problematic situation as he claims that he is monogamous with whomever he is in a relationship with.

I just can't stand when he becomes an INTOLERABLE DIVA and then I HAVE TO WEAR THE PANTS in the relationship in order to MAINTAIN ORDER.  

I am not sure how long I can take this.

AGAIN - We are asked to believe that this is just a NORMAL DAY IN THE LIFE IN AMERICA.

We are being propagandized with he notion that GENDER ROLES are just happenstance.  
Our open minded media is merely today just opening a WIDER LENS upon America and that WE as consumers need to be more tolerant. 

Russia's Gay Night Club - A Refuge In A Sea Of Violence
The trajectory of the debate is predictable:

"How Can You CLAIM To Repudiate The Violence Against Homosexuals In Russia And Uganda Yet You Support The 'Anti-Sodomy Laws' Which Lead To Jail Time For Those Who Seek To Freely Express Who They Are?"

The goal is to generate pro-Gay activism but mostly to silence in the face of the clear media propagandism in support of the current run up of "Gay Rights" by those who are seeking to define "The NEW NORMAL" and who feign outrage that EVERYONE has not yet gotten the memo.

Try and focus on the issue of A FRAMEWORK OF SOCIETAL STABILITY where, like it or not THERE ARE STRONG GENDER ROLES that are both enforced by society and UNDERSTOOD based upon the messaging that is carried out throughout society.

What type of stability can be had from these two scenes where GAY MALES IN DRAG are considered "NORMAL AND FREE" - as ABC News called it during their advocacy?

If there is such a thing as "Establishment Power Repudiation" in which those who have given birth to such a society per their activism against "The Machine", yet when they get into power and are now in control over the "Commanding Heights" and are forced to produce the society benefits that they attacked the previous establishment for failing to do so because of BIGOTRY - this new school promises to fail to develop even more people yet deny their hand in the matter.

The common talking points of "Freedom", "Equality" and "Discrimination-Free Society" are the key DISARMING WORDS by which we all are asked to "LIVE UP TO".   Yet this equation fails to include the DAMAGE that is suffered by individuals who live in a society that ultimately fails to provide a sufficient infrastructure upon which people are developed within the ecosystem which has certain issues that have plagued man throughout the millennium settled into a stable operating base.


The woman in the first frame should not be surprised to see that there is no future in her relationship with an off the wall "diva".   And, heaven forbid, if she is exposed to the HIV virus as "her man" chooses to engage in "The Life" - add this as yet another set of risks that she chose to look past.

The Russian situation is more complex.  ME PERSONALLY chooses to look at the chaotic condition in Central Africa in which there is societal breakdown in violence and terrorism - concluding that while the gay minority has it bad in the face of violent thugs seeking to enforce anti-Sodomy - the larger population of Africans in the center of the continent suffer from a far more indiscriminate amount of terror.

YOU HELP ME FIX CENTRAL AFRICA FIRST and then I'll help you fight Homophobia in Russia.

We tried that one before.

Monday, January 13, 2014

There Is No Such Thing As "Non-Judgemental". There Is Only A New List Of Discriminators

Chicago Black Youth Trapped In Violence: "Violence Won't End Until We Can Make Money Off Of Peace"

MSNBC - Melissa Harris-Perry Anti-Gun Violence Series

Most people, upon viewing these remarks will consider this young male as being unrealistic.

His view is correct.  His construct is wrong.

The ECOSYSTEM of Chicago has failed to produce the conditions through which young Black people like him can be more fully engaged in the productive operations of the community - in their pursuit to retain a desired STANDARD OF LIVING.

We hear positive reactions to "The Pope" as he notes the damage of capitalistic lust.   This notion is applied to wealth people.

Yet if we consider how the Catholic church has a legacy of compelling believers to submit themselves to "God" through the church, becoming nuns, priests and fathers - that ran the church institution and associated Catholic school - the proper answer to this young man's perspective is to ask the ADULTS in the community:  "What would you have the young people in your community to submit to, adopting a disposition of 'Denial of Self' so that more of the 'Social Justice Rights' that you ascribe to the larger community are now delivered as a more local dispensation?"

Tuesday, January 07, 2014

I Disagree With Evander Holyfield's Line Of Argument That Says "Homosexuality Is Not 'Normal' "

In my assessment - Former boxing Heavyweight champ - Evander Holyfield has just "Stepped In It" with his statements that "Homosexuality is not 'Normal' ".

Just as "they" (ubiquitous "they") can BRING THEIR OWN BIBLE VERSE to argue against many of the things that Holyfield believes in as "normal" - so is the case with his inspection of the "normality" of homosexuality.

In the next few weeks we will likely hear sundry details of Mr Holyfield's:
  • Serial Marriages
  • Adultry
  • Fornication
 He set up this attack on his person  because of the paucity of his argument.


I am against a government attempting to regulate the personal and social behavior of free individuals - as long as they don't harm anyone else in their course of living.

HOWEVER - as a SOCIETY (and for those of us 'People Of Faith') we are asked to "Help Our Fellow Man".

Those (who I believe) are seeking to USE this mandate to make POLITICAL gains, by shifting this which is an INDIVIDUAL calling from our spiritual, religious and "character" composition to "Help Our Fellow Man' - seek to stand at the "ribbon cutting" ritual - thanks to the use of other people's money - to claim that THEY have a special closeness with "God" as evidenced by their public policy.

When we inspect a bit further - the misalignment is exposed.
We can all agree that "broken familial relationships" are a key source of much of the dysfunction that we see in our society as children are imprinted with messages that run awry of what is statistically proven to be the key construct for success at allowing them to reach closer to their full potential.

I DO NOT get caught up into the trap that "Marriage is for 'baby making", only to suffer the "Well Why Do You Allow Elderly Straight Couples Who Won't Have Children To Marry Then?"

The bottom line is that we are talking about THEORIES OF SOCIETAL GOVERNANCE.

I REFUSE to allow a radical upstart set of theories to use their TRANSACTIONAL, Ideological Imperialism - to create a "New Societal Normal" - only to follow through with the "Establishment Power Repudiation" scheme - in which the resulting problems that REMAIN offer them yet another round of a "Struggle Motion" that will promise "a fix" - if they are giving more power and time to "correct them".

Ironically - those who argue most vociferously against the "exclusivity" that elite ranks of the society enjoy ( a special interest with power) are themselves guilty of trying to arrange POWER for their own bit of cultural imperialism as they operate like a 'distributor cap', seeking to cut a deal with a serial collection of special interest groups (transactional advocacy) - without assuming the responsibility of the establishment - WHO MUST STAND ACCOUNTABLE FOR "THE WHOLE".

In the pile of "unfinished business" - as the rotor on the 'distributor cap' rotates to the next special interest - the same vulnerable people whose COMMUNITY INSTITUTIONS have been taken over yet destroyed in their capability to develop the people who are most in need of order and the synergy of two adults, coupled together to support the effort of maintaining a house and a family - as THIS is "The Norm".  The "normality" of homosexuality is an IRRELEVANT discussion.

What we have is a SOCIETAL CHOICE at hand.

NO the world is not going to blow up with "hellfire" if "Same Sex Marriage" is made legal.  At the same time you will NOT have the balance of 6 year old children observe "same sex behavior" among adults and believe this to be anything but an exception.

Societal tolerance - yes.

The PRIORITIZATION OF THE NEED for STRONG FAMILIES, headed by one man and one woman, as a STRATEGIC foundation for a strong future - anything else IS ABNORMAL.

I will support YOUR STRUGGLE - when YOU finish BUILDING UP MY PEOPLE - as you had promised when you collected their valuables.