Edward Moore "Ted" Kennedy, long time Democratic senator from the State of Massachusetts. In office since 1962. Kennedy is described as "The Liberal Lion".
Kennedy is to be credited for the amount of power that he wields in the senate chambers. He has been known to be a driving force in working to cut deals with his more conservative adversaries. His main legislative focus has been upon social services among the poor and the working class in America.
If there was even an embodiment of Malcolm X's "Snarling Fox" - I know of no other force who could effect the long term destruction of the Black Independent Consciousness while working so closely to our people after being welcomed into our midst to do so.
I have noticed that those who know not what I am arguing against Senator Kennedy antics simply differ from me in that they prefer Black People having obtained the state of being "IN RECEIPT OF BENEFIT" without necessitating that this state be obtained via the transaction of value between two equal parties. Ironically - these are the same group of people who desire to have various African nations enter into the world economy as trading partners. There is a huge canyon that exists between their fantastical goals and their practices to obtain them.
Let me start off but putting two important background facts upon the table:
The Prevailing Black Establishment in America views Senator Kennedy in a very favorable light. (In fact the would be inclined to view ME as a "rogue negro".) Senator Kennedy routinely receives an "A" on the NAACP Legislative Report Card. This grade does not detail Senator Kennedy's "correctness" in absolute terms. It only details how closely the good senator stands with respect the the NAACP'S view of what is in the best interests of the African-American community. In as much as there is no overlay group to inspect the efficacy of the NAACP's platform upon the Black community - this will only ever be a relative judgement of Ted Kennedy and his popularity to the prevailing ideological order within the Black community. It should not be mistaken as an absolute reference until indeed these policies actually deliver what has long been struggled for, especially know that these policies in in place where our people live in our highest concentrations.
The second point that I must come clean about is that - I DO NOT LIKE TED KENNEDY'S LINE OF POLITICS AND IDEOLOGY. I SEE THEM AS A THREAT, REGARDLESS OF HOW MUCH IN DEMAND THEY ARE BY SOME WITHIN THE BLACK COMMUNITY.
Ted Kennedy is on a mission to give what he sees a "help" to the poor and the feeble of all races. In as much as the Black Establishment sees a Black face in the blank canvas of left-wing, progressive social justice policies - they see Ted Kennedy as worthy vehicle to ride along with. My problem with Ted Kennedy is my problem with "No-Fault Social Justice Progressivism": It asks the SOCIETY TO PROVE THAT IT VALUES THE DOWNTRODDEN INDIVIDUAL WITHOUT EVER ASKING THE INDIVIDUAL TO DO ANYTHING TO EXPRESS THEIR OWN WORTH VIA THEIR WORKS AND CHOICES.
This is not personal with Ted Kennedy and me. This is strictly based upon my analysis of the strategic path that my people should be taking.
Thus I put forward to cultural constructs by which to measure Senator Kennedy and his brand of social justice that will be implanted via Ted Kennedy-like Policies:
- The tie-in between the people's daily actions as guided by the prevailing community consciousness in correlation to the long term goals of the community
- The satisfaction with "Being In Receipt Of A Benefit" to make a people whole or the demand for a TRANSACTION that flows between the two or more parties
Simply put - "Ted Kennedy-like" Policies represent a direct assault upon the attainment of any sort of a highly developed cultural consciousness that ties behavior with long term outcomes.
Anyone reading my blog properties over an extended period of time already know the themes that I hit upon constantly:
- The danger of abstracting repetitive individual behavior from a people's end goals
- The devastation rendered by not being able to define the two way transaction that takes place when entitlement flows from one group of people to another
- With respect to the above point - when material benefit in one direction is "payed" with "Good Feelings" or thoughts that in doing so one has "Moved closer to God" with his actions - the giver receives a bit of aggrandizement while the receiver has been made one bit more incomplete for his original image to which his God has crafted him
- The harm of ASSUMED INFERIORITY - those who possess this attribute will always seek to shelter the inferior being from the consequences of his actions, inserting GOVERNMENT intervention to compensate for the failings of the people in question
I wish that my views were simply abstract theories, stuck in an academic environment. Instead - in my view - so much of the pathology that we see streaming from many majority Black communities serve as residue from these flawed strategies.
The popular view is that the legacy of "Slavery and Jim Crow" has dealt a body blow to the Black community. What we are witnessing is a people in "recovery mode". The call for Reparations is meant to provide the final "fix". For me this does not hold water.
When I hear this line of thinking I rarely hear two critical constructs being mentioned:
- The Potential Renewal Of Consciousness Contained In A New Born Black Child
- The Responsibility that comes with Incumbency
The Potential Renewal Of Consciousness Contained In A New Born Black Child
Both of these following points actually point back to the same elemental concept - MANAGEMENT.
A new born child represents an opportunity to indoctrinate the next generation of African Americans with a healthy set of thoughts and with a set of rules of interaction with other people that support our long term interests.
The "Ted Kennedy-types" would argue that indeed this is so, this is why we need to apply resources from the government which assist in removing this child from the snare that has been placed upon him by his impoverished circumstances.
My key criticism of this assumption is that in 16 to 30 years in the future this same assumption will be applied to these newborns when their kids are considered. In fact, if we simply abstract these basics of life from their shoulders we would not have to debate these elemental points in the first place. This only creates a serial, long running set of dysfunction. There will be strong motivation to apply corrective intervention upon the adults so that different outcomes can be had. Instead the SOCIETY will be asked to step up and show the universal worth of all who's fathers had inseminated their mothers in the qualifying lands.
Ted Kennedy-like policies actually represent a cheapening of the human rather than the edification of the need to tie the whole of the messages received during its formative years with some greater goals of higher social development. It is a "pull" rather than a "push".
The Responsibility that comes with Incumbency
In listening to certain Social Justice advocates one would swear that today is July, 26, 1909 instead of 2009. They continue their outward struggle despite having more control over the key institutions that the people who they seek entitlement on behalf of than ever before.
Aside from the formal elected political seats - they ultimately influence the entertainment culture, the academic culture, the social mores of their own communities and the economic practices within. I have noted previously that this group has a "Struggle" or "Chase" milieu. As they gain more ground in their quest for control - they simply remain focused outward, functionally increasing their control.
At some point the "Ted Kennedy-like" policies need to be judged based on their DELIVERABLES not their INTENTIONS. One's "intention" to feed the world may be a lofty goal. They should be appraised by the veracity of their plans - NOT by the formidableness of those they fight against. Such a displacement in analysis is why the "struggle" milieu remains entrenched. Failing to inspect the "good intentioned" soul is akin to supporting an aspiring actor while ignoring the fact that he has 3 kids to feed at home. In not trampling his dreams with a dose of cold water - those who fail to do such an inspection are enablers of the divergent course.
With such incumbency of the prevailing ideology the populace makes the mistake that "THE MACHINE'S ASCENDANCY" is their own. It is not. The machine must be forced to deliver upon its promises, jettisoning the theories that have failed thus far, replacing them with more effective alternatives. Failing to do so means that the people are more interested in pursuing an ideological domination rather than practical results.
BLACK PEOPLE AS 'USEFUL IDIOTS FOR 'TED KENNEDY'S AGENDA'
It is my opinion that those who think as Senator Kennedy does will always have a poster child to advocate for. If the entire Black community was to be healed from the clutches of Slavery and Jim Crow - the next generation of "Ted Kennedys" will come along a find a new bird of prey with a broken wing. I am not convinced that their goal is to restore this bird of prey back to its natural and organic order. It is my belief that they believe that their own souls are seen as pleasing to their God when they can show a compound full of "wounded birds" which they are providing care for. Thus - this is not about the birds - its about THEM.
A person who did care about the birds would seek to be as transparent as possible in their "care and feeding" of these who are "God's creatures".
Years ago I recall visiting a nature preserve in Florida. There was a sign that said "Do Not Feed The Birds. These Are Wild Birds. Their Interactions With Humans Providing Food Disrupt Their Natural Foraging Habits"
I struggle to understand how Environmentalist Liberals understand this point so clearly while the Social Justice Liberals just don't GET IT?

When the Black Community reaches a state of consciousness as arrived at by the great Fredrick Douglass in his "What Must We Do With The Negro" speech given more than 100 years ago we will collectively tell the "Ted Kennedy-types": NO THANK YOU. YOU HAVE HAVE HELPED US ENOUGH. THE HELP THAT YOU HAVE RENDERED THUS FAR HAS INJURED US GREATLY. LEAVE US ALONE. ALLOW US TO STAND OR FALL BASED ON OUR OWN MERITS.
The arrival at this point of consciousness by the Black man is a great source of fear for the White Liberal and his sold out Negro operative who seeks power in the political framework that resides in the American political system.
THIS IS WHY TED KENNEDY IS A THREAT TO BLACK CONSCIOUS THOUGHT.