Saturday, March 30, 2013

Genetically Modified Human Babies - Three Parents

Britain on course for 'three parent babies'

A few weeks ago I sat through a presentation about the pervasive data collection and "analytics" involved with tracking tracking consumer purchases and I saw "Big Brother On Steroids"

This article raised the very same concerns but instead of being a threat to our privacy - they are invading the space of our basic humanity.

At some point we have to accept that a genetic condition between a man and a woman makes it ill-advised for them to have a child together and that they should adopt.

The threats from bypassing our very nature exposes more threat than it does benefit.

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

On The "Gay Marriage Denial Hurts Children" Debate - Replace "Gay" With "Single Heterosexual" And Then Note The Incompetency Of This Body Of Thought To Apply Proportional Discipline

I want to be perfectly clear.

The ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States will be ultimately irrelevant to the long term ability of this society to GOVERN its people, putting forth a "functional culture" that produces results based upon social constructs that are known to increase the odds of such a product upon matriculation through.

Today's debate is about "CIVIL RIGHTS".
I have proven that the notion of "Civil Rights" is an element of "Popularism" and is used as a "Political Weapon For Indictment" (ie: "You are a bigot").

40,000 Children With Gay Parents Who Can't Legally Marry 
24 Million Children In Single Parent Homes

Questions from the justices do not always reliably forecast votes, of course, and many of the justices also indicated their views of the central issue presented in the case.When Justice Kennedy turned to the merits of the case, he voiced sympathy for the children of gay couples. “There are some 40,000 children in California,” he said, who “live with same-sex parents, and they want their parents to have full recognition and full status. The voice of those children is important in this case.”But Justice Kennedy said he was uncertain about the consequences for society of allowing same-sex marriage.“We have five years of information to weigh against 2,000 years of history or more,” he said, referring to the long history of traditional marriage and the brief experience of allowing gay men and lesbians to marry in some states.

Worse than the fact that this society is now abstracted from economic truth (thanks to the $17 Trillion in funny money debt by the federal government) is the growing disconnection between the CULTURE that is resident within our society and its FUNCTION in producing results that allow us to live at a high standard of living, in a nation that does not have many of the problems (ie: domestic terrorists of mass destruction) as other nations have to deal with.

I keep hearing people reference "The Wrong Side Of History" in their arguments.  This is a fraudulent stand. The ONLY point that they are making is that "You too should join in on their popular opinion before you get ran over".


The conservative who is opposed to "Gay Marriage" are rather incompetent at stating their case.
Indeed they are for "The Retention Of The Sanctity Of Traditional Marriage'.   However, lets be honest - this was lost a long time ago.    Their present focus on blocking 'Gay Marriage' is but battle for show.

On the front end - MY ARGUMENT - about how the institution of "Heterosexual Marriage" producing certain proven economic development and community stabilization results seems in line with the "conservative (political) message.

Don't be mistaken by the happenstance of agreement.

I choose to shift from 'RIGHTS' to "MANDATES'.    While we are debating the "Individual Right" to marry - it is the SOCIETY that has the MANDATE to regulate itself into the desired outcomes, lest it collapse.   Our "RIGHTS" (that are respected) are subordinate to the perpetual existence of the "container" within which these rights exist.      You might have a "right" to clean drinking water as a human being - however, if you find yourself stranded in the Sahara Desert - without anyone to oblige you of your rights - YOU ARE DEAD - a hungry omnivore will no doubt feast upon the meat and liquids that you carcass will contribute to its own perpetuation.    Any gold, diamonds or designer clothing will be tossed away as your flesh is the only "business end" of the transaction.

The New York Times report about how "males from single parent families continue to earn lower wages throughout their career" is not a "ticking time bomb" story that is necessary to raise the awareness of the "unwilling".    I am quite sure that those who believe that "selfish man" is ignoring "Global Warming" to his own peril - have some measure of overlay among the group of individuals who see the "Right To Marry Who They Choose To" above the observation that THE MARRIAGE OPERATION itself has been in a steady decline.

The point is that many of the institutional benefits of marriage are either:

  • AFFIRMED as yet another reason why gays should be allowed to marry, as the person holding this position steps over the question of the decline in heterosexual marriage
  • TRANSITIONED - as the Government Social Justice Programs aspire to provide the individual and families the same entitlements that the "married family unit" used to be the source of.

We then see - that this present state of ABSTRACTION of the wholesale married relationship between men and women is a function of "societal and economic" changes as these relationships appear to be abstracted from our basic foraging exercises.

Fiat Economy / Fiat Relationships

It stands to reason then that if we can life "carefree and lovely" with these abstractions in place - if and when the house of cards falls down - then MAN, by necessity will have to reconverge into some more FUNCTIONAL social order - as a critical means of producing the results in the society that perpetuate his human form AND a working social order that accompanies it.


We will come to the point where so much that we got used to, which has distracted us,   is taken away from us as we go back to the basic of survival. 

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

This American Life: "Harper High School" Chicago: The Theft Of Black Consciousness Using Insurgency Looks Something Like This

This American Life: Part 1: Harper High School In Chicago
Part II


The proper way to consider this situation that you have heard - in which the real world experiences of young Black people in Chicago is voiced for all to empathize with - is to understand that these kids, who were born in or around 1998 have formed a dysfunctional and violent set of social communications within their small ecosystem on the Southside of Chicago BECAUSE no FORCE FROM THEIR ADULT HANDLERS was presented to them that was strong enough to crowd out this naturally occurring forces that stem from the minds of young who don't have a broader view of the world.

Those who prefer to make this an indictment upon "America" will ask: "How is it that a Black child in America has his 'gang membership' determined simply by where his mother chose to move his family residence to?   How could America turn its back and allow this to happen?"

The truth is that this situation is merely a residual effect of the choices made by the Black community.
The forces who have convinced "The Least Of These" that the fix in their community will come after they join together in a national struggle and thus receive the resources that they need to be made whole - also understand that "The Least of These" don't have the spacial consciousness to demand ORGANIC DEVELOPMENT at certain checkpoints along the way - as proof that they will be developed upon the attainment of the "Finished Line".

Instead they are being USED - their anger, frustration and hatred - all without an Alternative - has them focused upon "The Big Pay Out" that will come via a political victory.

The truth is - the nation is experiencing entropy - just like what is occurring in their community.

Sunday, March 24, 2013

NY Times Publishes But Does Not Harp Upon The Study Which Says: Study of Men’s Falling Income Cites Single Parents

From The Article
WASHINGTON — The decline of two-parent households may be a significant reason for the divergent fortunes of male workers, whose earnings generally declined in recent decades, and female workers, whose earnings generally increased, a prominent labor economist argues in a new survey of existing research.
David H. Autor, a professor at theMassachusetts Institute of Technology, says that the difference between men and women, at least in part, may have roots in childhood. Only 63 percent of children lived in a household with two parents in 2010, down from 82 percent in 1970. The single parents raising the rest of those children are predominantly female. And there is growing evidence that sons raised by single mothers “appear to fare particularly poorly,” Professor Autor wrote in an analysisfor Third Way, a center-left policy research organization.
In this telling, the economic struggles of male workers are both a cause and an effect of the breakdown of traditional households. Men who are less successful are less attractive as partners, so some women are choosing to raise children by themselves, in turn often producing sons who are less successful and attractive as partners.
“A vicious cycle may ensue,” wrote Professor Autor and his co-author, Melanie Wasserman, a graduate student, “with the poor economic prospects of less educated males creating differentially large disadvantages for their sons, thus potentially reinforcing the development of the gender gap in the next generation.”
The fall of men in the workplace is widely regarded by economists as one of the nation’s most important and puzzling trends. While men, on average, still earn more than women, the gap between them has narrowed considerably, particularly among more recent entrants to the labor force.
For all Americans, it has become much harder to make a living without a college degree, for intertwined reasons including foreign competition, advancements in technology and the decline of unions. Over the same period, the earnings of college graduates have increased. Women have responded exactly as economists would have predicted, by going to college in record numbers. Men, mysteriously, have not.
Among people who were 35 years old in 2010, for example, women were 17 percent more likely to have attended college, and 23 percent more likely to hold an undergraduate degree

Monday, March 18, 2013

American Rates Of Religiosity At Historic Lows


The point that the survey does not detail is the "Religion" (Body of thoughts, rituals and coping mechanisms) that are replacing organized religion in the minds of many Americans.

"Government-ism" or "secularism" is a religion unto itself.
It attempts to fill the void in people's lives.

Friday, March 08, 2013

Slave History Via Orange Crate Packaging

I am not sure how I came across this web site but this is a personal bookmark for me to investigate further.